LB-004 Novel saccular endovascular aneurysm lattice (SEAL device) pre-seal it early clinical feasibility trial: procedural, 24-hours, and 3-month safety and effectiveness independent core lab adjudicated outcomes

IntroductionThe first-in-human PRE-SEAL IT trial was designed to assess the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the novel Saccular Endovascular Aneurysm Lattice (SEALTM) system in patients with previously untreated ruptured and unruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms (IA). Here, we present...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurointerventional surgery Vol. 15; no. Suppl 1; p. A244
Main Authors Pabón, B, Torres, V, Zaidi, S, Salahuddin, H, Patiño, M, Peláez, F, Mútis, J, Cardozo, M, Hussain, A, Lutfi, I, Ali, M, Ahmed, S, Pereira, E, Badruddin, A, Woodward, K, Wolfe, T, Langerford, C, Jankowitz, B, Costalat, V, Altschell, D, Kaffashi, M, Zaidat, O
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.07.2023
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:IntroductionThe first-in-human PRE-SEAL IT trial was designed to assess the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the novel Saccular Endovascular Aneurysm Lattice (SEALTM) system in patients with previously untreated ruptured and unruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms (IA). Here, we present the final demographic, procedural, 24-hour, and 3-month safety and effectiveness results from the 33 aneurysm that were treated in 29 patients with the SEALTM device and enrolled in the PRE-SEAL IT study.MethodsPRE-SEAL IT is a prospective, interventional, core-lab adjudicated, single-arm study performed in Medellin, Columbia and Pakistan. From January 2022 through March 2023, 29 patients with 33 IAs were enrolled into the PRE-SEAL IT trial and follow-up is ongoing. Key inclusion criteria included: 1. Age 20-80 years, 2. Saccular shape, bifurcation, or terminus IA, 3.Wide neck aneurysm with neck size ≥4mm or dome-to-neck ratio <2, and 4. IA diameter 2mm to 25mm. Consented and enrolled patients were treated with the SEALTM device. A follow-up DSA was performed at 24-hours, 6 months, and 12 months and a MRA at 3 months. Angiographic occlusion (Roy Raymond (RR) and Web Occlusion Scale (WOS)) was adjudicated by an independent interventional neuroradiologist (Oculus Imaging, TN, USA).ResultsIn 29 patients (twenty-two women and 7 men), 33 IAs were treated with the SEALTM device, with a mean age of 61.0± 13.5 years. Of the 33 IAs, the majority were anterior circulation (81.8%), bifurcation (75.8%), and unruptured (87.9%). Mean aneurysm width was 6.1 ± 3.0mm, with a mean neck size of 4.2±1.7mm and mean neck to dome ratio of 1.4±0.4. The SEAL Arc was used in 48.5% and SEAL Base in 51.5% of cases. No technical complications were observed in the study and technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. Immediate post-procedure complete occlusion (Grade A, B) was achieved in 4 patients (12.1%) and adequate occlusion (Grade A, B, C) in 8 (24.2.%). At 24-hour follow-up, 12 patients (36.4%) had complete occlusion, and 19 patients (57.6%) achieved adequate occlusion. At 3 months, 20/27 (74.1%) (RR I and WOS A), achieved complete occlusion, and 22/27 (81.5%) achieved adequate occlusion (RR I and II). No cases of peri-procedural stroke or new subarachnoid hemorrhage were reported up to the 3 month follow-up.ConclusionThe final procedural, 24-hour, and 3-month follow-up results of the PRE-SEAL-IT trial demonstrated promising occlusion rates at post-procedural, 24-hour, and 3 months follow-up with no safety concerns.DisclosuresB. Pabón: None. V. Torres: None. S. Zaidi: None. H. Salahuddin: None. M. Patiño: None. F. Peláez: None. J. Mútis: None. M. Cardozo: None. A. Hussain: None. I. Lutfi: None. M. Ali: None. S. Ahmed: None. E. Pereira: None. A. Badruddin: None. K. Woodward: None. T. Wolfe: None. C. Langerford: None. B. Jankowitz: None. V. Costalat: None. D. Altschell: None. M. Kaffashi: None. O. Zaidat: None.
Bibliography:SNIS 20th Annual Meeting Abstracts
ISSN:1759-8478
1759-8486
DOI:10.1136/jnis-2023-SNIS.378