A better mbs for all australians

ObjectivesThe MBS Review Taskforce is undertaking an independent clinician-led review of the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS). This is the first comprehensive review in 30 years of the 5700 items covered in the MBS. The priority with this review is to ensure that the items are aligned with contempor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry Vol. 88; no. 5; p. e1
Main Author Robinson, Bruce
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.05.2017
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectivesThe MBS Review Taskforce is undertaking an independent clinician-led review of the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS). This is the first comprehensive review in 30 years of the 5700 items covered in the MBS. The priority with this review is to ensure that the items are aligned with contemporary clinical evidence and practice and improve health outcomes for all Australians. The taskforce will also seek to identify any services that may be unnecessary, outdated or potentially unsafe. The taskforce is committed to providing recommendations to government that will allow the MBS to deliver on each of these key goals: affordable and universal access; best practice health services; value for the individual patient; and value for the health system. The clinical review of MBS items, ranging from consultations, procedures and diagnostics is carried out by discipline specific clinical committees and working groups.MethodsThe taskforce has asked the clinical committees to undertake the following tasks: consider whether there are items that are obsolete and should be removed from the MBS; consider identified priority reviews of selected MBS services; develop a program of work to consider the balance of MBS services within its remit and items assigned; and advise the taskforce on relevant general MBS issues identified in the course of their deliberations.ResultsCommittees release reports with draft recommendations and invite stakeholder feedback. The recommendations do not represent the final position on items and remain subject to consideration of stakeholder feedback and the taskforce. The taskforce will then deliver finalised recommendations to government throughout the review and deliver a final report to government at the end. To ensure the MBS remains up-to-date the taskforce will also develop an ongoing system of review after this current review is completed.ConclusionsWe will report progress of the neurology clinical committee establishment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0022-3050
1468-330X
DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2017-316074.25