82 Automating the literature review process to keep track of change in a rapidly evolving field: use of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine hospital care of children and young people (CYP)

BackgroundLittle is known about the routine use of PREMs and PROMs to improve experience and outcomes in paediatric clinical settings. Scoping reviews are useful to map existing knowledge, particularly in broad and quickly evolving areas, however they can be time consuming. Automated methods to hand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ paediatrics open Vol. 7; no. Suppl 2; p. A29
Main Authors Alarilla, Anne, Borja, Mario Cortina, Wray, Jo, Sebire, Neil J, Davies, Gwyneth
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.12.2023
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundLittle is known about the routine use of PREMs and PROMs to improve experience and outcomes in paediatric clinical settings. Scoping reviews are useful to map existing knowledge, particularly in broad and quickly evolving areas, however they can be time consuming. Automated methods to handle and analyse text data may be useful to efficiently map changes over time.AimsTo use automated techniques to understand how PROMs and PREMs are used in routine hospital care of children and young people, anchored to two time periods of manual literature searches.MethodsKey search terms were developed and seven databases searched. The initial search period was 1.1.2008 – 21.2.2021; updated search 22.2.2021 – 4.4.2023. Manual reviews were initially performed using Covidence. In total, 177 studies were included in the final manual analysis across the two periods. Text mining methods were used to characterise frequently occurring terms in abstracts. Qualitative comparisons were made between the ranking of terms in original and updated searches, using R.ResultsAcross all included studies, ‘implementation’, ‘psychosocial’, ‘pain’, ‘electronic’, ‘screen’ and ‘assessment’ were amongst the most frequently reported terms. However, the frequency ranking of terms in the studies obtained from 2021, compared to the 2023 search differed. For example, ‘screen’ and ‘KLIK’ had a lower ranking in the 2023 vs. 2021 search, whereas terms including ‘pain’ and ‘symptom’ ranked higher in 2023. Some words including ‘implementation’ stayed consistent.ConclusionsThe use of PROMs and PREMs in the routine care of children and young people is an evolving field, with a strong focus on implementation and, increasingly, capturing symptoms such as pain. We show how text mining methods may make scoping reviews more efficient, allowing researchers and clinical teams to keep abreast of literature trends.Acknowledgements for funding or supportWork supported by a Clinical Informatics Research Programme PhD studentship funded by GOSH Children’s Charity (Award VS0618).
Bibliography:GOSH Conference 2023
ISSN:2399-9772
DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2023-GOSH.60