Can MRI measure myelin? Systematic review, qualitative assessment, and meta-analysis of studies validating microstructural imaging with myelin histology

Abstract Recent years have seen an increased understanding of the importance of myelination in healthy brain function and neuropsychiatric diseases. Non-invasive microstructural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) holds the potential to expand and translate these insights to basic and clinical human re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inbioRxiv
Main Authors Lazari, Alberto, Lipp, Ilona
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Cold Spring Harbor Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 26.09.2020
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Edition1.2
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2692-8205
2692-8205
DOI10.1101/2020.09.08.286518

Cover

More Information
Summary:Abstract Recent years have seen an increased understanding of the importance of myelination in healthy brain function and neuropsychiatric diseases. Non-invasive microstructural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) holds the potential to expand and translate these insights to basic and clinical human research, but the sensitivity and specificity of different MR markers to myelination is a subject of debate. To consolidate current knowledge on the topic, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that validate microstructural imaging by combining it with myelin histology. We find meta-analytic evidence for correlations between myelin histology and markers from different MRI modalities, including fractional anisotropy, radial diffusivity, macromolecular pool, magnetization transfer ratio, susceptibility and longitudinal relaxation rate, but not mean diffusivity. Meta-analytic correlation effect sizes range widely, between R2 = 0.26 and R2 = 0.82. However, formal comparisons between MRI-based myelin markers are limited by methodological variability, inconsistent reporting and potential for publication bias, thus preventing the establishment of a single most sensitive strategy to measure myelin with MRI. To facilitate further progress, we provide a detailed characterisation of the evaluated studies as an online resource. We also share a set of 12 recommendations for future studies validating putative MR-based myelin markers and deploying them in vivo in humans. Highlights * Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies validating microstructural imaging with myelin histology * We find many MR markers are sensitive to myelin, including FA, RD, MP, MTR, Susceptibility, R1, but not MD * Formal comparisons between MRI-based myelin markers are limited by methodological variability, inconsistent reporting and potential for publication bias * Results emphasize the advantage of using multimodal imaging when testing hypotheses related to myelin in vivo in humans. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes * https://lazaral.github.io/Myelin-Validation-Systematic-Review/
Bibliography:SourceType-Working Papers-1
ObjectType-Working Paper/Pre-Print-1
content type line 50
Competing Interest Statement: The authors have declared no competing interest.
ISSN:2692-8205
2692-8205
DOI:10.1101/2020.09.08.286518