Humans sacrifice decision-making for action execution when a demanding control of movement is required

• Published in: bioRxiv
• Main Authors: Reynaud, Amélie J, Clara Saleri Lunazzi, Thura, David
• Format: Paper
• Language: English
• Published: Cold Spring Harbor Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 09.04.2020; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
• Edition: 1.2
• Subjects: Basal ganglia; Decision making; Hypotheses; Mental task performance; Motor task performance; Neuroscience; Reinforcement; Vigor; Decision-making; Reaching; Human; Speed-accuracy trade-off; Urgency
• ISSN: 2692-8205; 2692-8205
• DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.08.028936

A growing body of evidence suggests that decision-making and action execution are governed by partly overlapping operating principles. Especially, previous work proposed that a shared decision urgency/movement vigor signal, possibly computed in the basal ganglia, coordinates both deliberation and movement durations in a way that maximizes reward rate. Recent data support one aspect of this hypothesis, indicating that the urgency level at which a decision is made influences the vigor of the movement produced to express this choice. Here we investigated whether conversely, the motor context in which a movement is executed determines decision speed and accuracy. Twenty human subjects performed a probabilistic decision task in which perceptual choices were expressed by reaching movements toward targets whose size and distance from a starting position varied in distinct blocks of trials. We found strong evidence for an influence of the motor context on most of subjects' decision policy but contrary to the predictions of the "shared regulation" hypothesis, we observed that slow movements executed in the most demanding motor blocks in terms of accuracy were often preceded by faster and less accurate decisions compared to blocks of trials in which big targets allowed expression of choices with fast and inaccurate movements. These results suggest that decision-making and motor control are not regulated by one unique "invigoration" signal determining both decision urgency and action vigor, but more likely by independent, yet interacting, decision urgency and movement vigor signals. Competing Interest Statement