Entrenchment in cognitive grammar

While linguistic descriptions have to be justified in their own terms, they should at least be plausible from the psychological standpoint. As a guiding strategy, therefore, cognitive grammar (CG) aims at maximal coverage of language structure on the basis of some minimal assumptions about cognition...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEntrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge pp. 39 - 56
Main Author Langacker, Ronald W.
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC, Boston, MA American Psychological Association 2017
De Gruyter Mouton
SeriesLanguage and the human lifespan series
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:While linguistic descriptions have to be justified in their own terms, they should at least be plausible from the psychological standpoint. As a guiding strategy, therefore, cognitive grammar (CG) aims at maximal coverage of language structure on the basis of some minimal assumptions about cognition. It adopts the working hypothesis that a viable descriptive framework can be formulated relying only on cognitive phenomena—entrenchment being one—that are either well established or easily demonstrated. Although CG, as a linguistic framework, says nothing specific about their neural basis or psychological implementation, ascertaining their role in language contributes to their empirical investigation. The following discussion of entrenchment considers its nature, its linguistic manifestations, and some theoretical issues it bears on. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: chapter)
Bibliography:SourceType-Books-1
ObjectType-Book Chapter-2
ObjectType-Book-1
content type line 8
ISBN:9783110341300
3110341301
9783110341423
3110341425
DOI:10.1037/15969-003