Reconsidering the Avian Nature of the Oviraptorosaur Brain (Dinosauria: Theropoda)

The high degree of encephalization characterizing modern birds is the product of a long evolutionary history, our understanding of which is still largely in its infancy. Here we provide a redescription of the endocranial space of the oviraptorosaurian dinosaur Conchoraptor gracilis with the goal of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 12; p. e113559
Main Authors Balanoff, Amy M, Bever, G S, Norell, Mark A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 10.12.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The high degree of encephalization characterizing modern birds is the product of a long evolutionary history, our understanding of which is still largely in its infancy. Here we provide a redescription of the endocranial space of the oviraptorosaurian dinosaur Conchoraptor gracilis with the goal of assessing the hypothesis that it shares uniquely derived endocranial characters with crown-group avians. The existence of such features has implications for the transformational history of avian neuroanatomy and suggests that the oviraptorosaur radiation is a product of the immediate stem lineage of birds-after the divergence of Archaeopteryx lithographica. Results derived from an expanded comparative sample indicate that the strong endocranial similarity between Conchoraptor and modern birds largely reflects shared conservation of plesiomorphic features. The few characters that are maintained as being uniquely expressed in these two taxa are more likely products of convergence than homology but still indicate that the oviraptorosaur endocranial cavity has much to teach us about the complex history of avian brain evolution.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: AMB GSB MAN. Performed the experiments: AMB. Analyzed the data: AMB GSB MAN. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MAN. Wrote the paper: AMB GSB MAN.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0113559