Cerebral Blood Flow Measurement Using fMRI and PET: A Cross-Validation Study

• Published in: International Journal of Biomedical Imaging Vol. 2008; no. 1; pp. 165 - 176
• Main Authors: Chen, Jean J., Wieckowska, Marguerite, Meyer, Ernst, Pike, G. Bruce
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Hindawi Limiteds 01.01.2008; Hindawi Publishing Corporation; John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Accuracy; Brain; Descriptive labeling; Human subjects; Medical imaging; Medical research; Methods; Validation studies
• ISSN: 1687-4188; 1687-4196
• DOI: 10.1155/2008/516359

An important aspect of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is the study of brain hemodynamics, and MR arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging has gained wide acceptance as a robust and noninvasive technique. However, the cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements obtained with ASL fMRI have not been fully validated, particularly during global CBF modulations. We present a comparison of cerebral blood flow changes (ΔCBF) measured using a flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) ASL perfusion method to those obtained using H2O15 PET, which is the current gold standard for in vivo imaging of CBF. To study regional and global CBF changes, a group of 10 healthy volunteers were imaged under identical experimental conditions during presentation of 5 levels of visual stimulation and one level of hypercapnia. The CBF changes were compared using 3 types of region-of-interest (ROI) masks. FAIR measurements of CBF changes were found to be slightly lower than those measured with PET (average ΔCBF of 21.5±8.2% for FAIR versus 28.2±12.8% for PET at maximum stimulation intensity). Nonetheless, there was a strong correlation between measurements of the two modalities. Finally, a t-test comparison of the slopes of the linear fits of PET versus ASL ΔCBF for all 3 ROI types indicated no significant difference from unity (P>.05).