Space-Efficient Graph Coarsening with Applications to Succinct Planar Encodings

• Main Authors: Hammer, Nina, Kammer, Frank, Meintrup, Johannes
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 12.05.2022
• Subjects: Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms
• DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2205.06128

We present a novel space-efficient graph coarsening technique for $n$-vertex planar graphs $G$, called cloud partition, which partitions the vertices $V(G)$ into disjoint sets $C$ of size $O(\log n)$ such that each $C$ induces a connected subgraph of $G$. Using this partition $P$ we construct a so-called structure-maintaining minor $F$ of $G$ via specific contractions within the disjoint sets such that $F$ has $O(n/\log n)$ vertices. The combination of $(F, P)$ is referred to as a cloud decomposition. For planar graphs we show that a cloud decomposition can be constructed in $O(n)$ time and using $O(n)$ bits. Given a cloud decomposition $(F, P)$ constructed for a planar graph $G$ we are able to find a balanced separator of $G$ in $O(n/\log n)$ time. Contrary to related publications, we do not make use of an embedding of the planar input graph. We generalize our cloud decomposition from planar graphs to $H$-minor-free graphs for any fixed graph $H$. This allows us to construct the succinct encoding scheme for $H$-minor-free graphs due to Blelloch and Farzan (CPM 2010) in $O(n)$ time and $O(n)$ bits improving both runtime and space by a factor of $\Theta(\log n)$. As an additional application of our cloud decomposition we show that, for $H$-minor-free graphs, a tree decomposition of width $O(n^{1/2 + \epsilon})$ for any $\epsilon > 0$ can be constructed in $O(n)$ bits and a time linear in the size of the tree decomposition. Finally, we implemented our cloud decomposition algorithm and experimentally verified its practical effectiveness on both randomly generated graphs and real-world graphs such as road networks. The obtained data shows that a simplified version of our algorithms suffices in a practical setting, as many of the theoretical worst-case scenarios are not present in the graphs we encountered.