Declarative Guideline Conformance Checking of Clinical Treatments: A Case Study
Conformance checking is a process mining technique that allows verifying the conformance of process instances to a given model. Thus, this technique is predestined to be used in the medical context for the comparison of treatment cases with clinical guidelines. However, medical processes are highly...
Saved in:
Main Authors | , , , , |
---|---|
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
20.09.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Conformance checking is a process mining technique that allows verifying the
conformance of process instances to a given model. Thus, this technique is
predestined to be used in the medical context for the comparison of treatment
cases with clinical guidelines. However, medical processes are highly variable,
highly dynamic, and complex. This makes the use of imperative conformance
checking approaches in the medical domain difficult. Studies show that
declarative approaches can better address these characteristics. However, none
of the approaches has yet gained practical acceptance. Another challenge are
alignments, which usually do not add any value from a medical point of view.
For this reason, we investigate in a case study the usability of the HL7
standard Arden Syntax for declarative, rule-based conformance checking and the
use of manually modeled alignments. Using the approach, it was possible to
check the conformance of treatment cases and create medically meaningful
alignments for large parts of a medical guideline. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2209.09535 |