Chromatic number is not tournament-local

Scott and Seymour conjectured the existence of a function $f \colon \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ such that, for every graph $G$ and tournament $T$ on the same vertex set, $\chi(G) \geqslant f(k)$ implies that $\chi(G[N_T^+(v)]) \geqslant k$ for some vertex $v$. In this note we disprove this conjecture...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors Girão, António, Hendrey, Kevin, Illingworth, Freddie, Lehner, Florian, Michel, Lukas, Savery, Michael, Steiner, Raphael
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 24.05.2023
Subjects
Mathematics - Combinatorics
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Scott and Seymour conjectured the existence of a function $f \colon \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ such that, for every graph $G$ and tournament $T$ on the same vertex set, $\chi(G) \geqslant f(k)$ implies that $\chi(G[N_T^+(v)]) \geqslant k$ for some vertex $v$. In this note we disprove this conjecture even if $v$ is replaced by a vertex set of size $\mathcal{O}(\log{\lvert V(G)\rvert})$. As a consequence, we answer in the negative a question of Harutyunyan, Le, Thomass\'{e}, and Wu concerning the corresponding statement where the graph $G$ is replaced by another tournament, and disprove a related conjecture of Nguyen, Scott, and Seymour. We also show that the setting where chromatic number is replaced by degeneracy exhibits a quite different behaviour.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2305.15585