Improved Spin-State Energy Differences of Fe(II) molecular and crystalline complexes via the Hubbard U-corrected Density

We recently showed that the DFT+U approach with a linear-response U yields adiabatic energy differences biased towards high spin [Mariano et al. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 6755-6762]. Such bias is removed here by employing a density-corrected DFT approach where the PBE functional is evaluated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors Mariano, Lorenzo A, Vlaisavljevich, Bess, Poloni, Roberta
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 18.01.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We recently showed that the DFT+U approach with a linear-response U yields adiabatic energy differences biased towards high spin [Mariano et al. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 6755-6762]. Such bias is removed here by employing a density-corrected DFT approach where the PBE functional is evaluated on the Hubbard U -corrected density. The adiabatic energy differences of six Fe(II) molecular complexes computed using this approach, named here PBE[U], are in excellent agreement with coupled luster-corrected CASPT2 values for both weak- and strong-field ligands resulting in a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.44 eV, smaller than the recently proposed Hartree-Fock density-corrected DFT (1.22 eV) and any other tested functional, including the best performer TPSSh (0.49 eV). We take advantage of the computational efficiency of this approach and compute the adiabatic energy differences of five molecular crystals using PBE[U] with periodic boundary conditions. The results show, again, an excellent agreement (MAE=0.07 eV) with experimentally-extracted values and a superior performance compared with the best performers TPSSh (MAE=0.08 eV) and M06-L (MAE=0.31 eV) computed on molecular fragments.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2101.07035