Comparison of two tools for production availability analyses: MAROS and GRIF/BStok

Ma\^\itrise des Risques et de S\^uret\'e de Fonctionnement, Lambda-Mu 18, Oct 2012, Tours, France. Institut pour la Ma\^itrise des Risques, pp.8A-4, Actes du 18\`eme Congr\`es de Ma\^itrise des Risques et de S\^uret\'e de Fonctionnement, Lambda-Mu 18 This comparison aims to present differe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors Buvry, P, Brissaud, F, Declerck, B, Varela, H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 20.01.2015
Subjects
Mathematics - Optimization and Control
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Ma\^\itrise des Risques et de S\^uret\'e de Fonctionnement, Lambda-Mu 18, Oct 2012, Tours, France. Institut pour la Ma\^itrise des Risques, pp.8A-4, Actes du 18\`eme Congr\`es de Ma\^itrise des Risques et de S\^uret\'e de Fonctionnement, Lambda-Mu 18 This comparison aims to present different functionalities provided by two software tools among the most used for production availability analyses: MAROS (developed by DNV) and GRIF/BStok (developed by Total). The different functionalities are presented and compared through tables. Then, a case study allows comparing the results obtained by the two tools. MAROS and GRIF/BStok both provide production availability analyses that meet industrial needs. While the use of MAROS brings to the user more "conviviality", a drawback is the "black box" aspect that results from it. BStok, thanks to the underlying exploitation of Petri nets, supplies more modeling flexibility in exchange of higher expertise.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1501.04935