Electric Field Calculation and PNS Prediction for Head and Body Gradient Coils

• Main Authors: Roemer, Peter B, Wade, Trevor, Alejski, Andrew, Ertan, Koray, McKenzie, Charles A, Rutt, Brian K
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 15.12.2020
• Subjects: Physics - Medical Physics
• DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.08694

Purpose: To demonstrate and validate E-field calculation and PNS prediction methods that are accurate, computationally efficient and that could be used to inform regulatory standards. Methods: We describe a simplified method for calculating the spatial distribution of induced E-field over the volume of a body model given a gradient coil vector potential field. The method is easily programmed without finite element or finite difference software, allowing for straightforward and computationally-efficient E-field evaluation. Using these E-field calculations and a range of body models, population-weighted PNS thresholds are determined using established methods and compared against published experimental PNS data for two head gradient coils and one body gradient coil. Results: A head-gradient-appropriate chronaxie value of 669us was determined by meta-analysis. Prediction errors between our calculated PNS parameters and the corresponding experimentally measured values were ~5% for the body gradient and ~20% for the symmetric head gradient. Our calculated PNS parameters matched experimental measurements to within experimental uncertainty for 73% of deltaGmin estimates and 80% of SRmin estimates. Computation time is seconds for initial E-field maps and milliseconds for E-field updates for different gradient designs, allowing for highly efficient iterative optimization of gradient designs and enabling new dimensions in PNS-optimal gradient design. Conclusions: We have developed accurate and computationally efficient methods for prospectively determining PNS limits, with specific application to head gradient coils.