Reclaiming Privacy and Performance over Centralized DNS
The Domain Name System (DNS) is both a key determinant of users' quality of experience (QoE) and privy to their tastes, preferences, and even the devices they own. Growing concern about user privacy and QoE has brought a number of alternative DNS services, from public DNS to encrypted and Obliv...
Saved in:
| Main Authors | , |
|---|---|
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
26.02.2023
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Summary: | The Domain Name System (DNS) is both a key determinant of users' quality of
experience (QoE) and privy to their tastes, preferences, and even the devices
they own. Growing concern about user privacy and QoE has brought a number of
alternative DNS services, from public DNS to encrypted and Oblivious DNS. While
offering valuable features, these DNS variants are operated by a handful of
providers, reinforcing a trend towards centralization that has raised concerns
about privacy, competition, resilience and Web QoE. The goal of this work is to
let users take advantage of third-party DNS services, without sacrificing
privacy or performance. We follow Wheeler's advice, adding another level of
indirection with an end-system DNS resolver, Onoma, that improves privacy,
avoiding DNS-based user-reidentification by inserting and sharding requests
across resolvers, and improves performance by running resolution races among
resolvers and reinstating the client-resolver proximity assumption content
delivery networks rely on. As our evaluation shows, while there may not be an
ideal service for all clients in all places, Onoma dynamically finds the best
service for any given location. |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2302.13274 |