The Steady-State Dipole-Flow Test for Characterization of Hydraulic Conductivity Statistics in a Highly Permeable Aquifer: Horkheimer Insel Site, Germany

• Published in: Ground water Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 504 - 516
• Main Authors: Zlotnik, Vitaly A., Zurbuchen, Brian R., Ptak, Thomas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2001; National Ground Water Association; Ground Water Publishing Company
• Subjects: Aquifers; Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation; Environmental sciences; Geologic Sediments - chemistry; Germany; Groundwater flow; Hydraulics; Hydrology; Measurement; Methods; Permeability; Soil; Soil permeability; Water Movements; Water, Underground; United States; Germany
• ISSN: 0017-467X; 1745-6584
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02339.x

Over the last decade the dipole‐flow test (DFT) evolved from the general idea of using recirculatory flow to evaluate aquifer properties, to the development of prototype instrumentation and feasibility studies, to a reliable tool for characterization of aquifer heterogeneity. The DFT involves the interpretation of head in recirculatory flow between injection and extraction sections (chambers) in a single well isolated from each other by a multipacker system. In this study, the steady‐state dipole flow test (DFT) has been used to characterize the statistics of horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kr) of the highly permeable, heterogeneous, and thin aquifer at the Horkheimer Insel site, Germany. In previous studies, Kr estimates were based on the steady‐state head difference between chambers. A new by‐chamber interpretation is proposed that is based on drawdown within each individual chamber. This interpretation yields more detailed information on structure of heterogeneity of the aquifer without introducing complexity into the analysis. The DFT results indicate that Kr ranges from 49 to 6000 m/day (mean In Kr [(m/s)]∼—4, and variance of In Kr [(m/s)] ∼ 1–2). Descriptive statistics from the DFT compare well with those from previous field and laboratory tests (pumping, borehole flowmeter, and permeameter tests and grain‐size analysis) at this site. It is shown that the role of confining boundaries in the DFT interpretation is negligible even in this case of a thin (< 4 m thick) aquifer. This study demonstrates the flexibility of the DFT and expands the potential application of this method to a wide range of hydrogeologic settings.