Cranial asymmetry in Eocene archaeocete whales and the evolution of directional hearing in water
Eocene archaeocete whales gave rise to all modern toothed and baleen whales (Odontoceti and Mysticeti) during or near the Eocene-Oligocene transition. Odontocetes have asymmetrical skulls, with asymmetry linked to high-frequency sound production and echolocation. Mysticetes are generally assumed to...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 108; no. 35; pp. 14545 - 14548 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
30.08.2011
National Acad Sciences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Eocene archaeocete whales gave rise to all modern toothed and baleen whales (Odontoceti and Mysticeti) during or near the Eocene-Oligocene transition. Odontocetes have asymmetrical skulls, with asymmetry linked to high-frequency sound production and echolocation. Mysticetes are generally assumed to have symmetrical skulls and lack high-frequency hearing. Here we show that protocetid and basilosaurid archaeocete skulls are distinctly and directionally asymmetrical. Archaeocete asymmetry involves curvature and axial torsion of the cranium, but no telescoping. Cranial asymmetry evolved in Eocene archaeocetes as part of a complex of traits linked to directional hearing (such as pan-bone thinning of the lower jaws, mandibular fat pads, and isolation of the ear region), probably enabling them to hear the higher sonic frequencies of sound-producing fish on which they preyed. Ultrasonic echolocation evolved in Oligocene odontocetes, enabling them to find silent prey. Asymmetry and much of the sonic-frequency range of directional hearing were lost in Oligocene mysticetes during the shift to low-frequency hearing and bulk-straining predation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Author contributions: J.M.F., P.D.G., and A.R.W. designed research; J.M.F., P.D.G., and R.C.W. performed research; A.R.W. contributed new analytic tools; J.M.F., P.D.G., R.C.W., and A.R.W. analyzed data; and J.M.F. and P.D.G. wrote the paper. Edited by David B. Wake, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved July 28, 2011 (received for review June 2, 2011) |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1108927108 |