VA Residential Provider Perceptions of Dissuading Factors to the Use of Two Evidence-Based PTSD Treatments

Providers ( = 198) from 38 Department of Veterans Affairs residential posttraumatic stress disorder treatment programs across the United States completed qualitative interviews regarding implementation of 2 evidence-based treatments: prolonged exposure and cognitive processing therapy. As part of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProfessional psychology, research and practice Vol. 45; no. 2; p. 136
Main Authors Cook, Joan M, Dinnen, Stephanie, Simiola, Vanessa, Thompson, Richard, Schnurr, Paula P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.04.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Providers ( = 198) from 38 Department of Veterans Affairs residential posttraumatic stress disorder treatment programs across the United States completed qualitative interviews regarding implementation of 2 evidence-based treatments: prolonged exposure and cognitive processing therapy. As part of this investigation, providers were asked how they decide which patients are appropriate for these treatments. Many indicated that they did not perceive any patient factors that dissuade their use of either evidence-based treatment. However, 3 broad categories emerged surrounding reasons that patients were perceived to be less suitable candidates for the treatments: the presence of psychiatric comorbidities, cognitive limitations, and low levels of patient motivation. Interestingly, providers' perceived reasons for limited or nonuse of a treatment did not correspond entirely to those espoused by treatment developers. Possible solutions to address provider concerns, including educational and motivational interventions, are noted.
ISSN:0735-7028
1939-1323
DOI:10.1037/a0036183