Emotion understanding and theory of mind among maltreated children in foster care: Evidence of deficits
Children in foster care are at heightened risk for poor psychosocial outcomes. This study examined differences in two areas that may be associated with many of these outcomes, emotion understanding and theory of mind, using a sample of 3- to 5-year-old maltreated foster children (n = 60) and a compa...
Saved in:
Published in | Development and psychopathology Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 47 - 65 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, USA
Cambridge University Press
01.03.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Children in foster care are at heightened risk for poor psychosocial
outcomes. This study examined differences in two areas that may be
associated with many of these outcomes, emotion understanding and theory
of mind, using a sample of 3- to 5-year-old maltreated foster children
(n = 60) and a comparison group of same-aged, low-income,
nonmaltreated children living with their biological families (n =
31). Being in foster care was significantly associated with worse emotion
understanding and theory of mind capabilities, even when accounting for
age, intelligence, and executive function. There were no significant
associations between length of time in foster care, number of transitions,
and emotion understanding and theory of mind. Results help to expand
knowledge about the cognitive and affective deficits of children in foster
care and suggest that interventions targeted at these deficits include an
emphasis on emotion understanding and theory of mind.Support for this research was provided by grants from NIMH
(R01 MH59780 and R01 MH65046), NIMH and Office of Research on Minority
Health (P30 MH46690), and NICHD (R01 HD34511). The authors express
appreciation to Lou Moses and Seth Pollak for their comments on an earlier
draft of the paper, to the staff and families of the Early Intervention
Foster Care project, and to Matthew Rabel for editorial
assistance. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/6GQ-XZRSHHZ1-P PII:S0954579405050030 istex:125C7233207E20B735989B190BB0AB12B5B7DF54 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0954-5794 1469-2198 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0954579405050030 |