Discrepant feeling rules and unscripted emotion work: women coping with termination for fetal anomaly

• Published in: American journal of orthopsychiatry Vol. 79; no. 4; p. 441
• Main Author: McCoyd, Judith L M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.10.2009
• Subjects: Abortion, Legal - psychology; Adaptation, Psychological; Adult; Emotions; Female; Fetus - abnormalities; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Middle Aged; Pregnancy; Psychological Theory; Social Environment
• ISSN: 1939-0025
• DOI: 10.1037/a0010483

The sociology of emotion is rapidly evolving and has implications for medical settings. Advancing medical technologies create new contexts for decision-making and emotional reaction that are framed by "feeling rules." Feeling rules guide not only behavior, but also how one believes one should feel, thereby causing one to attempt to bring one's authentic feelings into line with perceived feeling rules. Using qualitative data, the theoretical existence of feeling rules in pregnancy and prenatal testing is confirmed. Further examination extends this analysis: at times of technological development feeling rules are often discrepant, leaving patients with unscripted emotion work. Data from a study of women who interrupted anomalous pregnancies indicate that feeling rules are unclear when competing feeling rules are operating during times of societal and technological change. Because much of this occurs below the level of consciousness, medical and psychological services providers need to be aware of potential discrepancies in feeling rules and assist patients in identifying the salient feeling rules. Patients' struggles ease when they can recognize the discrepancies and assess their implications for decision-making and emotional response.