Psychiatrists' Attitudes Toward Dissociative Disorders Diagnoses

Four responses to the paper by Pope et al. (1999; 156:pp.321-3), complaining of failure to mention 2 methodologically sound studies; bias and unfamiliarity regarding the dissociative disorders; serious misconception about the standards for adding new diagnoses to DSM-IV and about the placement of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of psychiatry Vol. 157; no. 7; p. 1179
Main Authors FRANKEL, A. STEVEN, SPAN, SHERRY A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Psychiatric Publishing 01.07.2000
American Psychiatric Association
Subjects
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitudes
Bias
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Diagnosis
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV
Dissociative disorders
Dissociative Disorders - diagnosis
Dissociative Disorders - psychology
Forensic Psychiatry
Humans
Psychiatrists
Psychiatry
Research Design - standards
Terminology as Topic
United States
USA
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Four responses to the paper by Pope et al. (1999; 156:pp.321-3), complaining of failure to mention 2 methodologically sound studies; bias and unfamiliarity regarding the dissociative disorders; serious misconception about the standards for adding new diagnoses to DSM-IV and about the placement of the disorders in appendix B; and questions as to the sample's representativeness. Pope et al. reply. (Quotes from original text)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ObjectType-Commentary-2
ISSN:0002-953X
1535-7228
DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.7.1179