Phylogeny and Biogeography of a Cosmopolitan Frog Radiation: Late Cretaceous Diversification Resulted in Continent-Scale Endemism in the Family Ranidae
Ranidae is a large anuran group with a nearly cosmopolitan distribution. We investigated the phylogenetic relationships and early biogeographic history of ranid frogs, using 104 representatives of all subfamilies and families, sampled from throughout their distribution. Analyses of ∼ 1570 bp of nucl...
Saved in:
Published in | Systematic biology Vol. 55; no. 4; pp. 579 - 594 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Society of Systematic Zoology
01.08.2006
Taylor & Francis Oxford University Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Ranidae is a large anuran group with a nearly cosmopolitan distribution. We investigated the phylogenetic relationships and early biogeographic history of ranid frogs, using 104 representatives of all subfamilies and families, sampled from throughout their distribution. Analyses of ∼ 1570 bp of nuclear gene fragments (Rag-1, rhod, Tyr) and ∼ 2100 bp of the mitochondrial genome (12S rRNA, tRNAVAL, 16S rRNA) indicate that the monophyly of several taxa can be rejected with high confidence. Our tree is characterized by a clear historical association of each major clade with one Gondwanan plate. This prevalence of continent-scale endemism suggests that plate tectonics has played a major role in the distribution of ranid frogs. We performed dispersal-vicariance analyses, as well as analyses constrained by paleogeographic data, to estimate ancestral distributions during early ranid diversification. Additionally, we used molecular clock analyses to evaluate whether these scenarios fit the temporal framework of continental breakup. Our analyses suggest that a scenario in which the ancestors of several clades (Rhacophorinae, Dicroglossinae, Raninae) reached Eurasia via the Indian subcontinent, and the ancestor of Ceratobatrachinae entered via the Australia–New Guinea plate, best fits the paleogeographic models and requires the fewest number of dispersal/vicariance events. However, several alternatives, in which part of the ranid fauna colonized Laurasia from Africa, are not significantly worse. Most importantly, all hypotheses make clear predictions as to where to expect key fossils and where to sample other living ranids, and thus constitute a strong basis for further research. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:6A1AFE645EC50E534E7F13A03C460C994C754BF7 Current Address: Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045, USA ark:/67375/HXZ-BGJ43M5S-L ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1063-5157 1076-836X |
DOI: | 10.1080/10635150600812551 |