THE ROBUSTNESS OF APTITUDE EFFECTS IN NEAR-NATIVE SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Results from a number of recent studies suggest that nativelike adult second language (L2) learners possess a high degree of language learning aptitude, the positive effects of which may have compensated for the negative effects of a critical period in these learners. According to the same studies,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStudies in second language acquisition Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 481 - 509
Main Authors Abrahamsson, Niclas, Hyltenstam, Kenneth
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.12.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Results from a number of recent studies suggest that nativelike adult second language (L2) learners possess a high degree of language learning aptitude, the positive effects of which may have compensated for the negative effects of a critical period in these learners. According to the same studies, child learners seem to attain a nativelike command of the L2 regardless of high or low aptitude, which has led researchers to conclude that this factor plays no role in early acquisition. The present study investigates the L2 proficiency and language aptitude of 42 near-native L2 speakers of Swedish (i.e., individuals whom actual mother-tongue speakers of Swedish believe are native speakers). The results confirm previous research suggesting that a high degree of language aptitude is required if adult learners are to reach a L2 proficiency that is indistinguishable from that of native speakers. However, in contrast to previous studies, the present results also identify small yet significant aptitude effects in child SLA. Our findings lead us to the conclusions that the rare nativelike adult learners sometimes observed would all turn out to be exceptionally talented language learners with an unusual ability to compensate for maturational effects and, consequently, that their nativelikeness per se does not constitute a reason to reject the critical period hypothesis.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/6GQ-W6ZK9JJ8-7
istex:8BE16ED502E2194E3AAE5F0A99E33889E0F8AA43
PII:S027226310808073X
ArticleID:08073
This study was made possible by a research grant to the authors from The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation (grant No. 1999-0383:01). We would like to thank Johan Roos for carrying out the testing and data collection, our colleagues at the Centre for Research on Bilingualism at Stockholm University for their comments on earlier versions of this article, and Thomas Lavelle for correcting and improving our English writing.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0272-2631
1470-1545
1470-1545
DOI:10.1017/S027226310808073X