The Role of Plant Innate Immunity in the Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis

A classic view of the evolution of mutualism is that it derives from a pathogenic relationship that attenuated over time to a situation in which both partners can benefit. If this is the case for rhizobia, then one might uncover features of the symbiosis that reflect this earlier pathogenic state. F...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnual review of plant biology Vol. 68; no. 1; pp. 535 - 561
Main Authors Cao, Yangrong, Halane, Morgan K, Gassmann, Walter, Stacey, Gary
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Annual Reviews 28.04.2017
Annual Reviews, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A classic view of the evolution of mutualism is that it derives from a pathogenic relationship that attenuated over time to a situation in which both partners can benefit. If this is the case for rhizobia, then one might uncover features of the symbiosis that reflect this earlier pathogenic state. For example, as with plant pathogens, it is now generally assumed that rhizobia actively suppress the host immune response to allow infection and symbiosis establishment. Likewise, the host has retained mechanisms to control the nutrient supply to the symbionts and the number of nodules so that they do not become too burdensome. The open question is whether such events are strictly ancillary to the central symbiotic nodulation factor signaling pathway or are essential for rhizobial host infection. Subsequent to these early infection events, plant immune responses can also be induced inside nodules and likely play a role in, for example, nodule senescence. Thus, a balanced regulation of innate immunity is likely required throughout rhizobial infection, symbiotic establishment, and maintenance. In this review, we discuss the significance of plant immune responses in the regulation of symbiotic associations with rhizobia, as well as rhizobial evasion of the host immune system.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1543-5008
1545-2123
DOI:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-041030