Modelling the impact of agroforestry on hydrology of Mara River Basin in East Africa

• Published in: Hydrological processes Vol. 30; no. 18; pp. 3139 - 3155
• Main Authors: Mwangi, Hosea M., Julich, Stefan, Patil, Sopan D., McDonald, Morag A., Feger, Karl-Heinz
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester Blackwell Publishing Ltd 30.08.2016; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: agroforestry; Calibration; catchment water balance; Freshwater; Hydrology; Land use; Modulus of rupture in bending; River basins; Soil (material); Soil erosion; SWAT model; Watersheds; Africa
• ISSN: 0885-6087; 1099-1085
• DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10852

Land‐use change is one of the main drivers of watershed hydrology change. The effect of forestry related land‐use changes (e.g. afforestation, deforestation, agroforestry) on water fluxes depends on climate, watershed characteristics and spatial scale. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was calibrated, validated and used to simulate the impact of agroforestry on the water balance in the Mara River Basin (MRB) in East Africa. Model performance was assessed by Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) and Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE). The NSE (and KGE) values for calibration and validation were: 0.77 (0.88) and 0.74 (0.85) for the Nyangores sub‐watershed, and 0.78 (0.89) and 0.79 (0.63) for the entire MRB. It was found that agroforestry in the watershed would generally reduce surface runoff, mainly because of enhanced infiltration. However, it would also increase evapotranspiration and consequently reduce baseflow and overall water yield, which was attributed to increased water use by trees. Spatial scale was found to have a significant effect on water balance; the impact of agroforestry was higher at the smaller headwater catchment (Nyangores) than for the larger watershed (entire MRB). However, the rate of change in water yield with an increase in area under agroforestry was different for the two and could be attributed to the spatial variability of climate within the MRB. Our results suggest that direct extrapolation of the findings from a small sub‐catchment to a larger watershed may not always be accurate. These findings could guide watershed managers on the level of trade‐offs that might occur between reduced water yields and other benefits (e.g. soil erosion control, improved soil productivity) offered by agroforestry. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.