Quantitative null-cobordism

For a given null-cobordant Riemannian \(n\)-manifold, how does the minimal geometric complexity of a null-cobordism depend on the geometric complexity of the manifold? In [Gro99], Gromov conjectured that this dependence should be linear. We show that it is at most a polynomial whose degree depends o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Chambers, Gregory R, Dotterrer, Dominic, Manin, Fedor, Weinberger, Shmuel
Format Paper Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 24.07.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For a given null-cobordant Riemannian \(n\)-manifold, how does the minimal geometric complexity of a null-cobordism depend on the geometric complexity of the manifold? In [Gro99], Gromov conjectured that this dependence should be linear. We show that it is at most a polynomial whose degree depends on \(n\). This construction relies on another of independent interest. Take \(X\) and \(Y\) to be sufficiently nice compact metric spaces, such as Riemannian manifolds or simplicial complexes. Suppose \(Y\) is simply connected and rationally homotopy equivalent to a product of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces: for example, any simply connected Lie group. Then two homotopic L-Lipschitz maps \(f, g : X \rightarrow Y\) are homotopic via a \(CL\)-Lipschitz homotopy. We present a counterexample to show that this is not true for larger classes of spaces \(Y\).
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1610.04888