Infeasibility and error bound imply finite convergence of alternating projections

This paper combines two ingredients in order to get a rather surprising result on one of the most studied, elegant and powerful tools for solving convex feasibility problems, the method of alternating projections (MAP). Going back to names such as Kaczmarz and von Neumann, MAP has the ability to tra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Behling, Roger, Bello-Cruz, Yunier, Luiz-Rafael Santos
Format Paper Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 29.07.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper combines two ingredients in order to get a rather surprising result on one of the most studied, elegant and powerful tools for solving convex feasibility problems, the method of alternating projections (MAP). Going back to names such as Kaczmarz and von Neumann, MAP has the ability to track a pair of points realizing minimum distance between two given closed convex sets. Unfortunately, MAP may suffer from arbitrarily slow convergence, and sublinear rates are essentially only surpassed in the presence of some Lipschitzian error bound, which is our first ingredient. The second one is a seemingly unfavorable and unexpected condition, namely, infeasibility. For two non-intersecting closed convex sets satisfying an error bound, we establish finite convergence of MAP. In particular, MAP converges in finitely many steps when applied to a polyhedron and a hyperplane in the case in which they have empty intersection. Moreover, the farther the target sets lie from each other, the fewer are the iterations needed by MAP for finding a best approximation pair. Insightful examples and further theoretical and algorithmic discussions accompany our results, including the investigation of finite termination of other projection methods.
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2008.03354