The rings of Neptune

• Published in: arXiv.org
• Main Authors: de Pater, Imke, Renner, Stéfan, Showalter, Mark R, Sicardy, Bruno
• Format: Paper Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 27.06.2019
• Subjects: Adaptive optics; Galatea; Hubble Space Telescope; Kepler laws; Neptune; Occultation; Optical properties; Optical thickness; Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics; Planetary rings; Solar orbits; Space telescopes
• ISSN: 2331-8422
• DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1906.11728

In 1984, three telescopes in South America recorded an occultation of a star near Neptune. It was attributed to the existence of a partial ring or ring arc. The existence of ring arcs around Neptune was confirmed during subsequent years via other occultation experiments and by the Voyager 2 spacecraft. The Voyager observations established that the Neptunian arcs are concentrations of particles embedded within Neptune's narrow Adams ring, the outermost of six tenuous rings discovered by Voyager and discussed here. Four ring arcs were identified: the trailing arc Fraternité, a double-component arc Egalité, dubbed Egalité 1 and 2, Liberté, and the leading arc Courage. The arcs varied in extent from \(\sim\) 1\(^\circ\) to \(\sim\) 10\(^\circ\), and together were confined to a longitude range of 40\(^\circ\), with typical radial widths of \(\sim\) 15 km and optical depth of order 0.1. The properties of the dusty component of Neptune's rings are also discussed in this chapter. Although the arcs should have been destroyed in a few months time through differential Keplerian motion, they appeared to persist at least throughout the Voyager era, and well beyond. However, observations from Earth (both with the Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based adaptive optics) show an evolution in the last three decades, with the disappearance of both Courage and Liberté by 2009. This chapter reviews the constraints provided on the mean motion of the arcs and Galatea, the satellite possibly responsible for the arc confinement. This in turn constrains the various models that have been proposed to explain the arc longevity.