Evaluation of Counterfactuality in Counterfactual Communication Protocols

We provide an in-depth investigation of parameter estimation in Nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers (NMZIs) using two information measures: the Shannon mutual information and the classical Fisher information. Protocols for counterfactual communition (CFC) have, so far, been based on two different de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Arvidsson-Shukur, D R M, Gottfries, A N O, Barnes, C H W
Format Paper Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 18.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2331-8422
DOI10.48550/arxiv.1705.06574

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We provide an in-depth investigation of parameter estimation in Nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers (NMZIs) using two information measures: the Shannon mutual information and the classical Fisher information. Protocols for counterfactual communition (CFC) have, so far, been based on two different definitions of counterfactuality. In particular, some schemes have been based on NMZI devices, but have recently been subject to criticism. We provide a methodology for evaluating the counterfactuality of these protocols, based on an information theoretical framework. More specifically, we make the assumption that any realistic quantum channel in MZI structures will have some weak uncontrolled interaction, and we use the Fisher information to measure counterfactual violations. The measure is used to evaluate the suggested counterfactual communication protocol by Salih et al. \cite{Salih13}. The protocol of Arvidsson-Shukur and Barnes \cite{ArvShukur16}, based on a different definition, is evaluated with a probability measure. Our results show that the definition of Arvidsson-Shukur and Barnes is satisfied by their scheme, whilst that of Salih et al. is only satisfied by perfect quantum channels. For realistic devices the latter protocol does not achieve its objective.
Bibliography:SourceType-Working Papers-1
ObjectType-Working Paper/Pre-Print-1
content type line 50
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1705.06574