The Lithophile Element Budget of Earth’s Core

• Published in: Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3 Vol. 23; no. 2
• Main Authors: Chidester, B, Lock, S J, Swadba, K, Rahman, Z, Righter, K, Campbell, A J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Johnson Space Center American Geophysical Union 01.02.2022; John Wiley & Sons, Inc; American Geophysical Union (AGU); Wiley
• Subjects: Accretion; Chondrites; Composition; core formation; diamond anvil cell; Earth; Earth core; Energy sources; Experiments; Geomagnetic field; Growth models; High temperature; lithophile elements; Lunar And Planetary Science And Exploration; Magnetic field; Magnetic fields; Metals; metal‐silicate partitioning; Oxides; Parameterization; Planet formation; Planets; Silica; Silicates; Light Element; Radiogenic; Dynamo; Core
• ISSN: 1525-2027; 1525-2027
• DOI: 10.1029/2021GC009986

The relative composition of Earth’s core and mantle were set during core formation. By determining how elements partition between metal and silicate at high pressures and temperatures, measurements of the mantle composition and geophysical observations of the core can be used to understand the mechanisms by which Earth formed. Here we present the results of metal–silicate partitioning experiments for a range of nominally lithophile elements (Al, Ca, K, Mg, O, S, Si, Th, U) and S to 85 GPa and up to 5400 K. With our results and a compilation of literature data, we developed a parameterization for partitioning that accounts for compositional dependencies in both the metal and silicate phases. Using this parameterization in a range of planetary growth models, we find that, in general, lithophile element partitioning into the metallic phase is enhanced at high temperatures. The relative abundances of FeO, SiO2 and MgO in the mantle vary significantly between planetary growth models, and the mantle abundances of these elements can be used to provide important constraints on Earth’s accretion. To match Earth’s core mass and mantle composition, Earth’s building blocks must have been enriched in Fe and depleted in Si compared with CI chondrites. Finally, too little Mg, Si and O are partitioned into the core for precipitation of oxides to be a major source of energy for the geodynamo. In contrast, several ppb of U can be partitioned into the core at high temperatures, and this energy source must be accounted for in thermal evolution models.