Counter-intuitive results in acousto-elasticity

We present examples of body wave and surface wave propagation in deformed solids where the slowest and the fastest waves do not travel along the directions of least and greatest stretch, respectively. These results run counter to commonly accepted theory, practice, and implementation of the principl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Gower, Artur L, Destrade, Michel, Ogden, Ray W
Format Paper Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 04.09.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2331-8422
DOI10.48550/arxiv.2009.02213

Cover

More Information
Summary:We present examples of body wave and surface wave propagation in deformed solids where the slowest and the fastest waves do not travel along the directions of least and greatest stretch, respectively. These results run counter to commonly accepted theory, practice, and implementation of the principles of acousto-elasticity in initially isotropic solids. For instance we find that in nickel and steel, the fastest waves are along the direction of greatest compression, not greatest extension (and vice-versa for the slowest waves), as soon as those solids are deformed. Further, we find that when some materials are subject to a small-but-finite deformations, other extrema of wave speeds appear in non-principal directions. Examples include nickel, steel, polystyrene, and a certain hydrogel. The existence of these ``oblique'', non-principal extremal waves complicates the protocols for the non-destructive determination of the directions of extreme strains.
Bibliography:SourceType-Working Papers-1
ObjectType-Working Paper/Pre-Print-1
content type line 50
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2009.02213