Sampling Optimized Code for Type Feedback

• Published in: arXiv.org
• Main Authors: Flückiger, Olivier, Wälchli, Andreas, Krynski, Sebastián, Vitek, Jan
• Format: Paper Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 05.10.2020
• Subjects: Compilers; Computer Science - Programming Languages; Feedback; Instruments; Optimization; Sampling
• ISSN: 2331-8422
• DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2010.02080

To efficiently execute dynamically typed languages, many language implementations have adopted a two-tier architecture. The first tier aims for low-latency startup times and collects dynamic profiles, such as the dynamic types of variables. The second tier provides high-throughput using an optimizing compiler that specializes code to the recorded type information. If the program behavior changes to the point that not previously seen types occur in specialized code, that specialized code becomes invalid, it is deoptimized, and control is transferred back to the first tier execution engine which will start specializing anew. However, if the program behavior becomes more specific, for instance, if a polymorphic variable becomes monomorphic, nothing changes. Once the program is running optimized code, there are no means to notice that an opportunity for optimization has been missed. We propose to employ a sampling-based profiler to monitor native code without any instrumentation. The absence of instrumentation means that when the profiler is not active, no overhead is incurred. We present an implementation is in the context of the Ř just-in-time, optimizing compiler for the R language. Based on the sampled profiles, we are able to detect when the native code produced by Ř is specialized for stale type feedback and recompile it to more type-specific code. We show that sampling adds an overhead of less than 3% in most cases and up to 9% in few cases and that it reliably detects stale type feedback within milliseconds.