Prioritizing Variables for Observational Study Design using the Joint Variable Importance Plot

• Published in: arXiv.org
• Main Authors: Liao, Lauren D, Zhu, Yeyi, Ngo, Amanda L, Chehab, Rana F, Pimentel, Samuel D
• Format: Paper Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 15.02.2024
• Subjects: Bias; Insulin; Matching; Nutrition therapy; Pharmacology; Statistics - Applications; Statistics - Methodology; Therapy; Variables
• ISSN: 2331-8422
• DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2301.09754

Observational studies of treatment effects require adjustment for confounding variables. However, causal inference methods typically cannot deliver perfect adjustment on all measured baseline variables, and there is often ambiguity about which variables should be prioritized. Standard prioritization methods based on treatment imbalance alone neglect variables' relationships with the outcome. We propose the joint variable importance plot to guide variable prioritization for observational studies. Since not all variables are equally relevant to the outcome, the plot adds outcome associations to quantify the potential confounding jointly with the standardized mean difference. To enhance comparisons on the plot between variables with different confounding relationships, we also derive and plot bias curves. Variable prioritization using the plot can produce recommended values for tuning parameters in many existing matching and weighting methods. We showcase the use of the joint variable importance plots in the design of a balance-constrained matched study to evaluate whether taking an antidiabetic medication, glyburide, increases the incidence of C-section delivery among pregnant individuals with gestational diabetes.