Fractionalized quantum criticality in spin-orbital liquids from field theory beyond the leading order

Two-dimensional spin-orbital magnets with strong exchange frustration have recently been predicted to facilitate the realization of a quantum critical point in the Gross-Neveu-SO(3) universality class. In contrast to previously known Gross-Neveu-type universality classes, this quantum critical point...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Shouryya Ray, Ihrig, Bernhard, Kruti, Daniel, Gracey, John A, Scherer, Michael M, Janssen, Lukas
Format Paper Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 01.04.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two-dimensional spin-orbital magnets with strong exchange frustration have recently been predicted to facilitate the realization of a quantum critical point in the Gross-Neveu-SO(3) universality class. In contrast to previously known Gross-Neveu-type universality classes, this quantum critical point separates a Dirac semimetal and a long-range-ordered phase, in which the fermion spectrum is only partially gapped out. Here, we characterize the quantum critical behavior of the Gross-Neveu-SO(3) universality class by employing three complementary field-theoretical techniques beyond their leading orders. We compute the correlation-length exponent \(\nu\), the order-parameter anomalous dimension \(\eta_\phi\), and the fermion anomalous dimension \(\eta_\psi\) using a three-loop \(\epsilon\) expansion around the upper critical space-time dimension of four, a second-order large-\(N\) expansion (with the fermion anomalous dimension obtained even at the third order), as well as a functional renormalization group approach in the improved local potential approximation. For the physically relevant case of \(N=3\) flavors of two-component Dirac fermions in 2+1 space-time dimensions, we obtain the estimates \(1/\nu = 1.03(15)\), \(\eta_\phi = 0.42(7)\), and \(\eta_\psi = 0.180(10)\) from averaging over the results of the different techniques, with the displayed uncertainty representing the degree of consistency among the three methods.
Bibliography:LTH 1253
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2101.10335