Understanding the Ising zigzag antiferromagnetism of FePS3 and FePSe3 monolayers

• Published in: arXiv.org
• Main Authors: Yang, Ke, Yueyue Ning, Zhou, Yuxuan, Lu, Di, Ma, Yaozhenghang, Liu, Lu, Pu, Shengli, Wu, Hua
• Format: Paper Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 24.07.2024
• Subjects: Anisotropy; Antiferromagnetism; Coupling; Ferromagnetism; Iron; Ising model; Magnetic structure; Monolayers; Parameters; Physics - Materials Science
• ISSN: 2331-8422
• DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2407.16978

This study investigates the spin-orbital states of FePS3 and FePSe3 monolayers and the origin of their Ising zigzag AFM, using DFT, crystal field level diagrams, superexchange analyses, and parallel tempering MC simulations. Our calculations show that under the trigonal elongation of the FeS6 (FeSe6) octahedra, the \(e_g^\pi\) doublet of the Fe 3d crystal field levels lies lower than the \(a_{1g}\) singlet by about 108 meV (123 meV), which is much larger than the strength of Fe 3d SOC. Then, the half-filled minority-spin \(e_g^\pi\) doublet of the high-spin Fe\(^{2+}\) ions (\(d^{5\uparrow,1\downarrow}\)) splits by the SOC into the lower \(L_{z+}\) and higher \(L_{z-}\) states. The spin-orbital ground state $d^{5\uparrow}$$L_{z+}^{1\downarrow}\( formally with \)S_z\( = 2 and \)L_z\( = 1 gives the large z-axis spin/orbital moments of 3.51/0.76 \)\mu_{B}\( (3.41/0.67 \)\mu_{B}\() for FePS\)_3\( (FePSe\)_3$) monolayer, and both the moments are reduced by the strong (stronger) Fe 3d hybridizations with S 3p (Se 4p) states. As a result, FePS3 (FePSe3) monolayer has a huge perpendicular single-ion anisotropy energy of 19.4 meV (14.9 meV), giving an Ising-type magnetism. Moreover, via the maximally localized Wannier functions, we find that the first nearest neighboring (1NN) Fe-Fe pair has large hopping parameters in between some specific orbitals, and so does the 3NN Fe-Fe pair. In contrast, the 2NN Fe-Fe pair has much smaller hopping parameters and the 4NN Fe-Fe pair has negligibly small ones. Then, a combination of those hopping parameters and the superexchange picture can readily explain the computed strong 1NN ferromagnetic coupling and the strong 3NN antiferromagnetic one but the relatively much smaller 2NN antiferromagnetic coupling. Furthermore, our PTMC simulations give TN of 119 K for FePS3 monolayer and also predict for FePSe3 monolayer the same magnetic structure with a close or even higher TN.