The Relationship between Different Assays for Detection and Quantification of Amyloid Beta 42 in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid

Alzheimer's disease (AD), which is characterized by a degeneration of neurons and their synapses, is one of the most common forms of dementia. CSF levels of amyloid β42 (Aβ42) have been recognized as a strong candidate to serve as an AD biomarker. There are a number of commercial assays that ar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of alzheimer's disease Vol. 2012; no. 2012; pp. 1 - 3
Main Authors Ellis, Teresa A., Li, Jinhe, LeBlond, David, Waring, Jeffrey F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Puplishing Corporation 2012
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Hindawi Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Alzheimer's disease (AD), which is characterized by a degeneration of neurons and their synapses, is one of the most common forms of dementia. CSF levels of amyloid β42 (Aβ42) have been recognized as a strong candidate to serve as an AD biomarker. There are a number of commercial assays that are routinely employed for measuring Aβ42; however, these assays give diverse ranges for the absolute levels of CSF Aβ42. In order to employ CSF Aβ42 as a biomarker across multiple laboratories, studies need to be performed to understand the relationship between the different platforms. We have analyzed CSF samples from both diseased and nondiseased subjects with two different widely used assay platforms. The results showed that different values for the levels of CSF Aβ42 were reported, depending on the assay used. Nonetheless, both assays clearly demonstrated statistically significant differences in the levels of Aβ42 in CSF from AD relative to age-matched controls (AMC). This paper provides essential data for establishing the relationship between these assays and provides an important step towards the validation of Aβ42 as a biomarker for AD.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Academic Editor: Jacob Raber
ISSN:2090-8024
2090-0252
DOI:10.1155/2012/984746