Gender Harassment Broadening Our Understanding of Sex-Based Harassment at Work
This study challenges the common legal and organizational practice of privileging sexual advance forms of sex-based harassment, while neglecting gender harassment. Survey data came from women working in two male-dominated contexts: the military and the legal profession. Their responses to the Sexual...
Saved in:
Published in | Law and human behavior Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 25 - 39 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Boston
Springer
01.02.2011
Springer Science+Business Media Springer US American Psychological Law Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study challenges the common legal and organizational practice of privileging sexual advance forms of sex-based harassment, while neglecting gender harassment. Survey data came from women working in two male-dominated contexts: the military and the legal profession. Their responses to the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) revealed five typical profiles of harassment: low victimization, gender harassment, gender harassment with unwanted sexual attention, moderate victimization, and high victimization. The vast majority of harassment victims fell into one of the first two groups, which described virtually no unwanted sexual advances. When compared to non-victims, gender-harassed women showed significant decrements in professional and psychological well-being. These findings underscore the seriousness of gender harassment, which merits greater attention by both law and social science. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0147-7307 1573-661X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10979-010-9241-5 |