Correlation-stability approach to elasticity mapping in OCT: comparison with displacement-based mapping and \textit{in vivo} demonstrations

A variant of compression optical coherence elastography for mapping relative tissue stiffness is reported. Unlike conventionally discussed displacement-based (DB) elastorgaphy, in which the decrease in the cross-correlation is a negative factor causing errors in mapping displacement and strain field...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Vladimir Yu Zaitsev, Matveev, Lev A, Gelikonov, Grigory V, Matveyev, Aleksandr L, Gelikonov, Valentin M
Format Paper Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 20.12.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A variant of compression optical coherence elastography for mapping relative tissue stiffness is reported. Unlike conventionally discussed displacement-based (DB) elastorgaphy, in which the decrease in the cross-correlation is a negative factor causing errors in mapping displacement and strain fields, we propose to intentionally use the difference in the correlation stability (CS) for deformed tissue regions with different stiffness. We compare the parameter ranges (in terms of noise-to-signal ratio and strain) in which the conventional DB- and CS-approaches are operable. It is shown that the CS approach has such advantages as significantly wider operability region in terms of strain and is more tolerant to noises. This is favorable for freehand implementation of this approach. Examples of simulated and real CS-based elastographic OCT images are given.
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1212.5227