Threat intensity widens fear generalization gradients

Research in nonhuman animals reveals threat-sensitive generalization of defensive behavior that favors widespread generalization when threat intensity is high and limited generalization (i.e., specificity) when threat intensity is low. Here, we used Pavlovian fear conditioning to systematically inve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavioral neuroscience Vol. 131; no. 2; p. 168
Main Authors Dunsmoor, Joseph E, Kroes, Marijn C W, Braren, Stephen H, Phelps, Elizabeth A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.04.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Research in nonhuman animals reveals threat-sensitive generalization of defensive behavior that favors widespread generalization when threat intensity is high and limited generalization (i.e., specificity) when threat intensity is low. Here, we used Pavlovian fear conditioning to systematically investigate whether threat intensity widens behavioral generalization gradients to stimuli that decreasingly resemble a learned threat cue. Using a between-subjects design, volunteers underwent fear conditioning with a tone paired with either a high-intensity or low-intensity aversive stimulus prior to a test of fear generalization to novel tones. Results showed no effect of threat intensity on initial acquisition of conditioned fear. However, volunteers who underwent fear conditioning with a high-intensity aversive stimulus exhibited widespread generalization of autonomic arousal (skin conductance responses) as compared to volunteers who received a low-intensity aversive stimulus. These results show a transition from normal (selective) to overgeneralized fear as threat intensity increases, and have implications for understanding overgeneralization characteristic of trauma- and stress-related disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record
ISSN:1939-0084
DOI:10.1037/bne0000186