Evaluation of the Panbio COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Test in Subjects Infected with Omicron Using Different Specimens

This study showed that the antigen rapid test for COVID19 worked fine using nasal swabs when it was utilized in patients infected with the Omicron variant, showing a concordance with PCR in 93% of patients tested. The nasal swab yielded more reliable results than the oral swab when an antigen rapid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMicrobiology spectrum Vol. 10; no. 3; p. e0125022
Main Authors Galliez, Rafael Mello, Bomfim, Larissa, Mariani, Diana, Leitão, Isabela de Carvalho, Castiñeiras, Anna Carla Pinto, Gonçalves, Cassia Cristina Alves, Ortiz da Silva, Bianca, Cardoso, Pedro Henrique, Arruda, Monica Barcelos, Alvarez, Patricia, Brindeiro, Rodrigo, Ota, Victor Akira, Rodrigues, Débora Gomes Marins, da Costa, Luciana Jesus, Ferreira, Orlando da Costa, Castiñeiras, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto, Faffe, Debora Souza, Tanuri, Amilcar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society for Microbiology 02.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study showed that the antigen rapid test for COVID19 worked fine using nasal swabs when it was utilized in patients infected with the Omicron variant, showing a concordance with PCR in 93% of patients tested. The nasal swab yielded more reliable results than the oral swab when an antigen rapid diagnosis test (the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic test) was used in patients infected with the Omicron variant. Community testing is a crucial tool for the early identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and transmission control. The emergence of the highly mutated Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) raised concerns about its primary site of replication, impacting sample collection and its detectability by rapid antigen tests. We tested the performance of the Panbio antigen rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) using nasal and oral specimens for COVID-19 diagnosis in 192 symptomatic individuals, with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) of nasopharyngeal samples as a control. Variant of concern (VOC) investigation was performed with the 4Plex SARS-CoV-2 screening kit. The SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate was 66.2%, with 99% of the positive samples showing an amplification profile consistent with that of the Omicron variant. Nasal Ag-RDT showed higher sensitivity (89%) than oral (12.6%) Ag-RDT. Our data showed good performance of the Ag-RDT in a pandemic scenario dominated by the Omicron VOC. Furthermore, our data also demonstrated that the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic test does not provide good sensitivity with oral swabs for Omicron Ag-RDT detection. IMPORTANCE This study showed that the antigen rapid test for COVID19 worked fine using nasal swabs when it was utilized in patients infected with the Omicron variant, showing a concordance with PCR in 93% of patients tested. The nasal swab yielded more reliable results than the oral swab when an antigen rapid diagnosis test (the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic test) was used in patients infected with the Omicron variant.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Debora Souza Faffe and Amilcar Tanuri share senior authorship.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rafael Mello Galliez and Larissa Bomfim contributed equally to this article. Author order was determined by the corresponding author after negotiation.
ISSN:2165-0497
2165-0497
DOI:10.1128/spectrum.01250-22