BIONOMICS OF THE FACE FLY, MUSCA AUTUMNALIS
The face fly was introduced from the Palearctic region and spread across North America in 20 years after World War II. Adults feed on cattle and horses, and larvae develop in fresh cattle dung. Little genetic differentiation appears between European and North American populations and among regions w...
Saved in:
Published in | Annual review of entomology Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 503 - 523 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Palo Alto, CA 94303-0139
Annual Reviews
01.01.1997
4139 El Camino Way, P.O. Box 10139 USA |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The face fly was introduced from the Palearctic region and spread across
North America in 20 years after World War II. Adults feed on cattle and horses,
and larvae develop in fresh cattle dung. Little genetic differentiation appears
between European and North American populations and among regions within North
America. After an autumnally initiated diapause, overwintered flies emerge in
spring and reproduce through late spring and summer. Generations after the
first overlap, and age structure develops toward a stable age distribution.
After three to ten generations, depending on weather, facultative diapause
interrupts host feeding and oogenesis, and flies with hypertrophied fat body
enter overwintering hibernaculae. Life table statistics and factors affecting
population growth and diapause are reviewed. Early views on the fly's
effects on animal productivity may have been exaggerated. On-farm control by
conventional means has not been effective because of the fly's population
dynamics and mobility. We suggest that the alternatives of classical biological
control and area-wide control with the sterile insect technique should be
considered. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 9737475 L72 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0066-4170 1545-4487 |
DOI: | 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.503 |