Sorption, degradation and mobility of microcystins in Chinese agriculture soils: risk assessment for groundwater protection

In the present paper, sorption, persistence, and leaching behavior of three microcystin variants in Chinese agriculture soils were examined. Based on this study, the values of capacity factor and slope for three MCs variants in three soils ranged from 0.69 to 6.00, and 1.01 to 1.54, respectively. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental pollution (1987) Vol. 144; no. 3; pp. 752 - 758
Main Authors Chen, Wei, Song, Lirong, Gan, Nanqin, Li, Lin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2006
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the present paper, sorption, persistence, and leaching behavior of three microcystin variants in Chinese agriculture soils were examined. Based on this study, the values of capacity factor and slope for three MCs variants in three soils ranged from 0.69 to 6.00, and 1.01 to 1.54, respectively. The adsorption of MCs in the soils decreased in the following order: RR>Dha 7 LR>LR. Furthermore, for each MC variant in the three soils, the adsorption rate in the soils decreased in the following order: soil A>soil C>soil B. The calculated half-time ranged between 7.9 and 17.8 days for MC-RR, 6.0–17.1 days for MC-LR, and 7.1–10.2 days for MC-Dha 7 LR. Results from leaching experiments demonstrated that recoveries of toxins in leachates ranged from 0–16.7% for RR, 73.2–88.9% for LR, and 8.9–73.1% for Dha 7 LR. The GUS value ranged from 1.48 to 2.06 for RR, 1.82–2.88 for LR, and 1.76–2.09 for Dha 7 LR. Results demonstrated the use of cyanobacterial collections as plant fertilizer is likely to be unsafe in soils. The use of cyanobacterial blooms as plant fertilizer is likely to be unsafe in soils.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.02.023
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0269-7491
1873-6424
DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2006.02.023