Confirming the Three-Factor Structure of the Disgust Scale—Revised in Eight Countries

The current study evaluates the factor structure of the Disgust Scale—Revised (DS-R) in eight countries: Australia, Brazil, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United States (N = 2,606). Confirmatory factor analysis is used to compare two different models of the DS-R and to inves...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cross-cultural psychology Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 234 - 255
Main Authors Olatunji, Bunmi O., Moretz, Melanie W., McKay, Dean, Bjorklund, Fredrik, de Jong, Peter J., Haidt, Jonathan, Hursti, Timo J., Imada, Sumio, Koller, Silvia, Mancini, Francesco, Page, Andrew C., Schienle, Anne
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2009
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The current study evaluates the factor structure of the Disgust Scale—Revised (DS-R) in eight countries: Australia, Brazil, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United States (N = 2,606). Confirmatory factor analysis is used to compare two different models of the DS-R and to investigate the invariance of the factor structure of the DS-R across countries and gender. A three-factor solution consisting of three different but interrelated disgust factors (a 12-item core disgust factor, an 8-item animal-reminder disgust factor, and a 5-item contamination disgust factor) best accounted for the data in all countries except the Netherlands. Relative to the United States, the three-factor solution is invariant in Australia, Brazil, and Japan but not in Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Sweden. The three-factor solution is also invariant across gender in most countries. The implications of these cross-cultural findings for promoting a more valid and reliable assessment of disgust dimensions, as assessed by the DS-R, are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0022-0221
1552-5422
1552-5422
DOI:10.1177/0022022108328918