Geological and oceanographic perspectives on event bed formation during Hurricane Katrina

Storm deposits in ancient shelf sediments typically form thick sequences of interbedded sand and mud deposited during shoreline regression, whereas modern shelf sediments are generally thin veneers deposited during shoreline transgression. In this paper we present a preliminary comparison between an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeophysical research letters Vol. 33; no. 23; pp. L23614 - n/a
Main Authors Keen, T. R., Furukawa, Y., Bentley, S. J., Slingerland, R. L., Teague, W. J., Dykes, J. D., Rowley, C. D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Geophysical Union 01.12.2006
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Storm deposits in ancient shelf sediments typically form thick sequences of interbedded sand and mud deposited during shoreline regression, whereas modern shelf sediments are generally thin veneers deposited during shoreline transgression. In this paper we present a preliminary comparison between ancient and modern storm beds deposited in these disparate contexts. Hurricane Katrina deposited a storm bed on the Louisiana shelf with a maximum observed thickness of 0.58 m, which thinned to approximately 0.1 m at 200 km west of landfall. This thickness is similar to event beds observed in both ancient and modern sediments. Using data for tropical cyclone landfalls in the Gulf of Mexico, we estimate the return time for a storm of this size to be 40–50 years in this region. This estimated frequency for deposition of storm beds is useful in evaluating ancient storm sequences that were deposited during similar climatic conditions.
Bibliography:istex:1522949E2DAA4A1805FE77D8AFC664625EC603D2
ark:/67375/WNG-PG4BKQ0B-X
ArticleID:2006GL027981
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007
DOI:10.1029/2006GL027981