Dense water formation in the Laptev Sea flaw lead

Two primitive equation‐based models are used to estimate the formation of total volumes either of Arctic cold halocline water (CHW), intermediate water (IMW), or deep water (DW) through freeze‐related salt rejection in the Siberian Laptev Sea flaw lead system. Model A assumes that the rejected salt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans Vol. 115; no. C12
Main Author Dethleff, Dirk
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2010
American Geophysical Union
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two primitive equation‐based models are used to estimate the formation of total volumes either of Arctic cold halocline water (CHW), intermediate water (IMW), or deep water (DW) through freeze‐related salt rejection in the Siberian Laptev Sea flaw lead system. Model A assumes that the rejected salt remixes with surface mixed water (SMW) beyond the leads until salinities allow for contribution to the midlayers of either the CHW, the IMW, or the DW. Model B simulates direct salt rejection to the upper layer of the cold halocline, and, after remixing here, further contribution to the midlayers of CHW, IMW, or DW. Averaging both model estimates, Laptev leads contribute either 0.161 Sv of CHW, 0.075 Sv of IMW, or 0.065 Sv of DW, which represents as much as ∼23%, ∼16%, or ∼30% of Arctic‐wide lead derived dense water contribution to the appropriate layer, respectively. Northwestern Laptev leads produce the greatest amount of dense water. These lead sections show very short buoyancy equilibrium timescales (∼6 to ∼13 days), and local dense water production may potentially be amplified by lateral brine injection into the cold halocline through bottom eddies. Central‐southern and southeastern leads generally produce little salt due to low surface water salinities. As definite separation mechanisms and proportion distributions of rejected lead brines into CHW, IWM, and DW are still unidentified in nature, a combination of lead salt rejection and remixing (model A) and direct downward expulsion of brine packages (model B) is assumed to steer Laptev lead dense water production.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-27FMMN37-M
ArticleID:2009JC006080
istex:D0E7A955087BF9D466F759BC53AA7DFFA98EA134
Tab-delimited Table 1.Tab-delimited Table 2.Tab-delimited Table 3.Tab-delimited Table 4.Tab-delimited Table 5.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0148-0227
2169-9275
2156-2202
2169-9291
DOI:10.1029/2009JC006080