Accuracy and Reliability of Uterine Contraction Identification Using Abdominal Surface Electrodes

• Published in: Clinical Medicine Insights: Women’s Health Vol. 2012; no. 2012; pp. 65 - 75
• Main Authors: Hayes-Gill, Barrie, Hassan, Sarmina, Mirza, Fadi G., Ommani, Sophia, Himsworth, John, Solomon, Molham, Brown, Raymond, Schifrin, Barry S., Cohen, Wayne R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England Libertas Academica 01.01.2012; SAGE Publishing; SAGE Publications; Sage Publications Ltd. (UK); Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: uterine contraction monitoring; uterine electromyography; electrohysterography; labor
• ISSN: 1179-562X; 1179-562X
• DOI: 10.4137/CMWH.S10444

Objective To compare the accuracy and reliability of uterine contraction identification from maternal abdominal electrohysterogram and tocodynamometer with an intrauterine pressure transducer. Methods Seventy-four term parturients had uterine contractions monitored simultaneously with electrohysterography, tocodynamometry, and intrauterine pressure measurement. Results Electrohysterography was more reliable than tocodynamometry when compared to the intrauterine method (97.1 versus 60.9 positive percent agreement; P < 0.001). The root mean square error was lower for electrohysterography than tocodynamometry in the first stage (0.88 versus 1.22 contractions/10 minutes; P < 0.001), and equivalent to tocodynamometry in the second. The positive predictive values for tocodynamometry and electrohysterography (84.1% versus 78.7%) were not significantly different, nor were the false positive rates (21.3% versus 15.9%; P = 0.052). The sensitivity of electrohysterography was superior to that of tocodynamometry (86.0 versus 73.6%; P < 0.001). Conclusion The electrohysterographic technique was more reliable and similar in accuracy to tocodynamometry in detecting intrapartum uterine contractions.