Quantitative Measurement of Immunoglobulins and Free Light Chains Using Mass Spectrometry

• Published in: Analytical chemistry (Washington) Vol. 87; no. 16; pp. 8268 - 8274
• Main Authors: VanDuijn, Martijn M, Jacobs, Joannes F. M, Wevers, Ron A, Engelke, Udo F, Joosten, Irma, Luider, Theo M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Chemical Society 18.08.2015
• Subjects: Blood Chemical Analysis - methods; Blood diseases; Chromatography, Liquid; Humans; Immunoglobulin Light Chains - blood; Immunoglobulins; Isotopes; Limit of Detection; Mass spectrometry; Mass Spectrometry - standards; Mathematical analysis; Molecules; Monitoring; Peptides; Proteins; Redundant; Reference Standards; Serums
• ISSN: 0003-2700; 1520-6882
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01263

Serum free light chain (sFLC) assays are well established in the diagnosis and monitoring of plasma cell disorders. However, current FLC immunoassays are subject to several analytical issues, which results in a lack of harmonized results. To facilitate sFLC standardization, we investigated the strengths and limitations of mass spectrometry as a novel technological platform for sFLC quantification. Stable isotope labeled reference peptides are added to serum samples for quantitation by selected reaction monitoring (SRM). The use of redundant peptide sets allows for quality control measures during data analysis. Measurements on serum provide information on intact immunoglobulins, but depletion of these intact molecules from the sera during sample processing permits the quantitation of sFLC. sFLC concentrations measured with SRM were comparable to those obtained by nephelometry and showed excellent linearity (r 2 > 0.99). In samples with high levels of sFLC, SRM data was more consistent with serum protein electrophoresis than nephelometric data and SRM is unaffected by antigen excess. The lower limits of quantitation were 3.8 and 2.7 mg/L for κ and λ sFLC. Errors due to polymorphic sequences were prevented by comparison of redundant peptide pairs. The application of stable isotope labeling combined with SRM can overcome many of the current potential analytical issues of sFLC analysis. We describe which hurdles still need to be taken to make SRM a robust and more accurate method for sFLC measurements.