The duration of prograde garnet crystallization in the UHP eclogites at Lago di Cignana, Italy

The distinct core-to-rim zonation of different REEs in garnet in metamorphic rocks, specifically Sm relative to Lu, suggests that Sm–Nd and Lu–Hf isochron ages will record different times along a prograde garnet growth history. Therefore, REE zonations in garnet must be measured in order to correctl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEarth and planetary science letters Vol. 287; no. 3; pp. 402 - 411
Main Authors Skora, Susanne, Lapen, Thomas J., Baumgartner, Lukas P., Johnson, Clark M., Hellebrand, Eric, Mahlen, Nancy J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 15.10.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The distinct core-to-rim zonation of different REEs in garnet in metamorphic rocks, specifically Sm relative to Lu, suggests that Sm–Nd and Lu–Hf isochron ages will record different times along a prograde garnet growth history. Therefore, REE zonations in garnet must be measured in order to correctly interpret the isochron ages in terms of the garnet growth interval, which could span several m.y. New REE profiles, garnet crystal size distributions, and garnet growth modeling, combined with previously published Sm–Nd and Lu–Hf geochronology on a UHP eclogite of the Zermatt–Saas Fee (ZSF) ophiolite, Lago di Cignana (Italy), demonstrate that prograde garnet growth of this sample occurred over a ~ 30 to 40 m.y. interval. Relative to peak metamorphism at 38 to 40 Ma, garnet growth is estimated to have begun at ~ 11 to 14 kbar pressure at ~ 70 to 80 Ma. Although such a protracted garnet growth interval is surprising, this is supported by plate tectonic reconstructions which suggest that subduction of the Liguro–Piemont ocean occurred through slow and oblique convergence. These results demonstrate that REE zonations in garnet, coupled to crystal size distributions, provide a powerful means for understanding prograde metamorphic paths when combined with Sm–Nd and Lu–Hf geochronology.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0012-821X
1385-013X
DOI:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.08.024