Considerations for the Use of Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice
Increasing antimicrobial resistance and medical device-related infections have led to a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative or adjunct to conventional antimicrobials. Expanded access and compassionate use cases have risen exponentially but have varied widely in approach, methodology,...
Saved in:
Published in | Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy Vol. 66; no. 3; p. e0207121 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Society for Microbiology
15.03.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0066-4804 1098-6596 1098-6596 |
DOI | 10.1128/aac.02071-21 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Increasing antimicrobial resistance and medical device-related infections have led to a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative or adjunct to conventional antimicrobials. Expanded access and compassionate use cases have risen exponentially but have varied widely in approach, methodology, clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered, dosing, route of administration, and outcomes.
Increasing antimicrobial resistance and medical device-related infections have led to a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative or adjunct to conventional antimicrobials. Expanded access and compassionate use cases have risen exponentially but have varied widely in approach, methodology, and clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered. Large gaps in knowledge contribute to heterogeneity in approach and lack of consensus in many important clinical areas. The Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) has convened a panel of experts in phage therapy, clinical microbiology, infectious diseases, and pharmacology, who worked with regulatory experts and a funding agency to identify questions based on a clinical framework and divided them into three themes: potential clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered, laboratory testing, and pharmacokinetic considerations. Suggestions are provided as answers to a series of questions intended to inform clinicians considering experimental phage therapy for patients in their clinical practices. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 The authors declare a conflict of interest. Mayo Clinic (Patel, Suh) has a business relationship with Adaptive Phage Therapeutics, Inc. Gina A. Suh and Thomas P. Lodise contributed equally; author order was decided by consensus during the planning stages of this work |
ISSN: | 0066-4804 1098-6596 1098-6596 |
DOI: | 10.1128/aac.02071-21 |