Considerations for the Use of Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice

Increasing antimicrobial resistance and medical device-related infections have led to a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative or adjunct to conventional antimicrobials. Expanded access and compassionate use cases have risen exponentially but have varied widely in approach, methodology,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy Vol. 66; no. 3; p. e0207121
Main Authors Suh, Gina A., Lodise, Thomas P., Tamma, Pranita D., Knisely, Jane M., Alexander, Jose, Aslam, Saima, Barton, Karen D., Bizzell, Erica, Totten, Katherine M. C., Campbell, Joseph L., Chan, Benjamin K., Cunningham, Scott A., Goodman, Katherine E., Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E., Harris, Anthony D., Hesse, Shayla, Maresso, Anthony, Nussenblatt, Veronique, Pride, David, Rybak, Michael J., Sund, Zoe, van Duin, David, Van Tyne, Daria, Patel, Robin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society for Microbiology 15.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0066-4804
1098-6596
1098-6596
DOI10.1128/aac.02071-21

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Increasing antimicrobial resistance and medical device-related infections have led to a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative or adjunct to conventional antimicrobials. Expanded access and compassionate use cases have risen exponentially but have varied widely in approach, methodology, clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered, dosing, route of administration, and outcomes. Increasing antimicrobial resistance and medical device-related infections have led to a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative or adjunct to conventional antimicrobials. Expanded access and compassionate use cases have risen exponentially but have varied widely in approach, methodology, and clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered. Large gaps in knowledge contribute to heterogeneity in approach and lack of consensus in many important clinical areas. The Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) has convened a panel of experts in phage therapy, clinical microbiology, infectious diseases, and pharmacology, who worked with regulatory experts and a funding agency to identify questions based on a clinical framework and divided them into three themes: potential clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered, laboratory testing, and pharmacokinetic considerations. Suggestions are provided as answers to a series of questions intended to inform clinicians considering experimental phage therapy for patients in their clinical practices.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
The authors declare a conflict of interest. Mayo Clinic (Patel, Suh) has a business relationship with Adaptive Phage Therapeutics, Inc.
Gina A. Suh and Thomas P. Lodise contributed equally; author order was decided by consensus during the planning stages of this work
ISSN:0066-4804
1098-6596
1098-6596
DOI:10.1128/aac.02071-21