Stress, distress and outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART): a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND A number of studies have investigated the relationship between psychological factors such as stress and distress (measured as anxiety and depression) and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The results, however, are inconsistent, and the strength of any associations remain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 26; no. 10; pp. 2763 - 2776
Main Authors Matthiesen, S.M.S., Frederiksen, Y., Ingerslev, H.J., Zachariae, R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.10.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND A number of studies have investigated the relationship between psychological factors such as stress and distress (measured as anxiety and depression) and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The results, however, are inconsistent, and the strength of any associations remains to be clarified. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the results of studies reporting on the associations between stress, anxiety, and depression and ART outcomes. METHODS Prospective studies reporting data on associations between stress or distress in female patients and ART outcome were identified and evaluated by two independent researchers according to an a priori developed codebook. Authors were contacted in cases of insufficient data reporting. Stress was defined as perceived stress, work-related stress, minor life events or major life events, and distress was defined as anxiety or depression. RESULTS A total of 31 prospective studies were included. Small, statistically significant, pooled effect sizes were found for stress [ESr, effect size correlation) = −0.08; P = 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.15, −0.01], trait anxiety (ESr = −0.14; P = 0.02, 95% CI: −0.25, −0.03) and state anxiety (ESr = −0.10, P = 0.03, 95% CI: −0.19, −0.01), indicating negative associations with clinical pregnancy rates. A non-significant trend (Esr = −0.11, P = 0.06) was found for an association between depression and clinical pregnancy. For serum pregnancy tests and live birth rates, associations between trait anxiety or state anxiety were not significant. The fail safe number did not exceed the suggested criterion in any analyses, between-study heterogeneity was considerable and the mean age, mean duration of infertility and percentage of first time ART attenders in the study samples were found to moderate several of the associations. CONCLUSIONS Small but significant associations were found between stress and distress and reduced pregnancy chances with ART. However, there were a limited number of studies and considerable between-study heterogeneity. Taken together, the influence of stress and distress on ART outcome may appear somewhat limited.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/der246